I wasn't there, don't recall even being invited, so I cannot judge
the quality of the proceedings there. On the group photo I saw
Nicholas Kazanas, who has been doing very important work credibly
establishing the case for an Indian homeland entirely within the
framework of Indo-European linguistics. So some progress may indeed
have been made.
But whether this is enough to offset the secularists'
rejoicing at the impending demise of Hindu revivalism?Just last week, coinciding with the conference,
in the same
California a final verdict was given in the textbook controversy.
There has been a deafening silence about it in the pro-Hindu camp and
a lot of victory-crowing on the anti-Hindu side. Briefly, it was a
smashing defeat for the Hindu parents, now in litigation after their
defeat before the California Board of Education in 2006.
:
:
:
After the Hindu defeat at the CA Board of Education, I was asked not
to comment in public on the emerging CAPEEM litigation initiative, so
I've kept mum while the court case was developing. But at no point
did I come across any information that indicated I might be proven
wrong in the end. The "discovery" process brought to light some
interesting links (i.e. cooperation) between the the Witzel faction
and Mission- or LTTE-affiliated anti-Hindu hate groups, but that
could not affect the basic issue nor the outcome.
And so the latest
is that Witzel and Farmer are crowing victory over the CAPEEM
verdict, which puts an end to the attempt at rewriting the textbooks
in a less anti-Hindu sense. Regardless of their own comments, the
actual quotations from the verdict, though of course selective, are
simply incompatible with any claim of Hindu/CAPEEM victory.
It's not the first time. In Delhi too, the textbook overhaul under MM
Joshi ca. 2002 ended in embarassment, ridicule and an ultimate
massive strengthening of the Marxist hold on the textbooks. At the
Hindu history-rewriting conference in Delhi IIC last January, the
usual wailing could be heard about the anti-Hindu bias in the
textbooks. No mention was made of the fact that the BJP had been in
charge for six years and that the textbooks had been changed already,
only so miserably that the Congress-Communist combine had no problem
at all justifying a return to the anti-Hindu textbooks. The
conference had no session on: "What did we do wrong?" This time
around, I suggest that all those involved in or cheering for the CA
textbook edit proposals face their own failure and do some honest
soul-searching.
In the 1990s, under SR Goel's guidance, an alternative Hindu school
of history was emerging. Today, most people involved (Harsh Narain,
AK Chatterjee, KS Lal, BR Grover, Goel himself) have left this world,
and their precious legacy has been mismanaged and squandered. MM
Joshi and his acolytes in India and the USA have a lot to answer for,
but they carry on regardless.
As for the RSS, it just keeps on
publishing self-praise for imaginary victories. The CAPEEM people
will have no way now to avoid facing the defeat they've suffered. I'd
like to say something more constructive and future-oriented than
this, but for now it is best to let the realization of utter defeat
fully sink in.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Abhinavag ... ssage/4885which verdict he is talking about?. I don't see it at
No comments:
Post a Comment